[Core data set for real world data in multiple sclerosis: customization for latin america from a global task force recommendation]. / Core data set para la generación de datos de la vida real en esclerosis múltiple: adaptación de una iniciativa global para América Latina.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of the core data set is to reduce heterogeneity and promote harmonization among data sources in EM, thereby reducing the time needed to execute real life data collection efforts. Recently, a group led by the Multiple Sclerosis Data Alliance has developed a core data set for collecting real-world data on multiple sclerosis (MS) globally. Our objective was to adapt this global data set to the needs of Latin America, so that it can be implemented by the registries already developed and in the process of development in the region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A working group was formed regionally, the core data set created globally was adapted (translation process into Spanish, incorporation of regional variables and consensus on variables to be used). Consensus was obtained through the remote Delphi methodology of a round of questionnaires and remote discussion of the core data set variables. RESULTS: A total of 25 professionals from Latin America carried out the adaptation process between November 2022 and July 2023. Agreement was established on a core data set of nine categories and 45 variables, version 2023 to suggest its implementation in developed or developing registries, and MS cohorts in the region. CONCLUSION: The core data set seeks to harmonize the variables collected by registries and cohorts in MS in Latin America in order to facilitate said collection and allow collaboration between sources. Its implementation will facilitate real life data collection and collaboration in the region.

TITLE: Core data set para la generación de datos de la vida real en esclerosis múltiple: adaptación de una iniciativa global para América Latina.Introducción. Los objetivos primarios del core data set son reducir la heterogeneidad y promover la armonización entre las fuentes de datos en la esclerosis múltiple (EM), reduciendo así el tiempo necesario para ejecutar esfuerzos en la recolección de datos de vida real. Recientemente, un grupo liderado por la Multiple Sclerosis Data Alliance ha desarrollado un core data set para la recolección de datos del mundo real en EM a nivel global. Nuestro objetivo ha sido adaptar y consensuar este conjunto de datos globales a las necesidades de América Latina para que pueda ser implementado por los registros ya desarrollados y en proceso de desarrollo en la región. Material y métodos. Se conformó un grupo de trabajo regionalmente y se adaptó el core data set creado globalmente (proceso de traducción al español, incorporación de variables regionales y consenso sobre variables que se iban a utilizar). El consenso se obtuvo a través de la metodología Delphi remoto de ronda de cuestionarios y discusión a distancia de las variables del core data set. Resultados. Veinticinco profesionales de América Latina llevaron adelante el proceso de adaptación entre noviembre de 2022 y julio de 2023. Se estableció un acuerdo sobre un core data set de nueve categorías y 45 variables, versión 2023, con la sugerencia de implementarlo en registros desarrollados o en vías de desarrollo y cohortes de EM en la región. Conclusión. El core data set busca armonizar las variables recolectadas por los registros y las cohortes de EM en América Latina con el fin de facilitar dicha recolección y permitir una colaboración entre fuentes. Su implementación facilitará la recolección de datos de vida real y la colaboración en la región.

Comorbilidades en la esclerosis múltiple y su influencia en la elección del tratamiento / Comorbidities in multiple sclerosis and their influence on the choice of treatment

Los estudios clínicos de tratamientos para personas con esclerosis múltiple (pEM) se realizan en poblaciones seleccionadas, que excluyen a pacientes que presenten comorbilidades o medicaciones concomitantes. Sin embargo, un gran porcentaje de las pEM tiene alguna enfermedad adicional, que podría afectar a la respuesta y la elección del tratamiento. El objetivo de esta revisión es valorar cómo pueden las diferentes patologías concurrentes impactar en la elección de las terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad (TME) en las pEM. Se seleccionaron artículos relevantes mediante búsqueda en PubMed. Las comorbilidades se agruparon, a los fines de mejor ordenamiento de los artículos encontrados, en patologías diversas: autoinmunes, infecciones crónicas, cardiovasculares, respiratorias, metabólicas, oncológicas, neuropsiquiátricas y epilepsia. En cuanto a las patologías autoinmunes, es clave tener en cuenta los efectos de las TME sobre ellas y la posibilidad de interacción con sus tratamientos específicos. Las terapias inmunomoduladoras son seguras para personas con infecciones crónicas. Los tratamientos inmunosupresores, en general, están contraindicados en personas con infecciones activas. En las comorbilidades cardiovasculares y metabólicas deben tenerse en cuenta las potenciales reacciones de infusión asociadas a anticuerpos monoclonales, y los fenómenos asociados al inicio de tratamiento con moduladores del receptor de la esfingosina-1-fosfato. Las TME con efecto inmunosupresor están contraindicadas en personas con malignidades activas. Aunque la patología psiquiátrica de por sí no impide el uso de TME, debería tenerse precaución cuando aparecen nuevos síntomas psiquiátricos, y siempre tenerse en cuenta su monitorización y tratamiento. Por este motivo, entre los múltiples factores que deben considerarse a la hora de iniciar o cambiar una TME en pEM, las comorbilidades constituyen un elemento muchas veces decisivo.(AU)

Clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for people with multiple sclerosis (pMS) are conducted in selected populations, excluding patients with comorbidities or concomitant medications. However, a large percentage of pMS have some additional disease, which could affect the response and choice of the DMT. The objective of this review is to assess how concurrent pathologies can impact the choice of DMTs. Relevant articles were selected through a systematic search in PubMed. Comorbidities were grouped for better classification into autoimmune, chronic infections, cardiovascular and metabolic, oncological and neuropsychiatric. In autoimmune pathologies, it is key to take into account the effects of TME on them and the possibility of interaction with their specific treatments. Immunomodulatory therapies are safe for people with chronic infections. Immunosuppressive treatments are generally contraindicated in people with active infections. In cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, infusion reactions associated with monoclonal antibodies, and the phenomena of starting treatment with S1P modulators, must be taken into account. DMTs with an immunosuppressive effect are contraindicated in people with active malignancies. Although psychiatric pathology per se does not preclude the use of DMTs, caution should be exercised when new psychiatric symptoms appear. For these reasons, among the multiple factors that must be considered when starting or changing a DMT in pMS, comorbidities constitute a decisive element.(AU)

[Comorbidities in multiple sclerosis and their influence on the choice of treatment]. / Comorbilidades en la esclerosis múltiple y su influencia en la elección del tratamiento.

Clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for people with multiple sclerosis (pMS) are conducted in selected populations, excluding patients with comorbidities or concomitant medications. However, a large percentage of pMS have some additional disease, which could affect the response and choice of the DMT. The objective of this review is to assess how concurrent pathologies can impact the choice of DMTs. Relevant articles were selected through a systematic search in PubMed. Comorbidities were grouped for better classification into autoimmune, chronic infections, cardiovascular and metabolic, oncological and neuropsychiatric. In autoimmune pathologies, it is key to take into account the effects of TME on them and the possibility of interaction with their specific treatments. Immunomodulatory therapies are safe for people with chronic infections. Immunosuppressive treatments are generally contraindicated in people with active infections. In cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, infusion reactions associated with monoclonal antibodies, and the phenomena of starting treatment with S1P modulators, must be taken into account. DMTs with an immunosuppressive effect are contraindicated in people with active malignancies. Although psychiatric pathology per se does not preclude the use of DMTs, caution should be exercised when new psychiatric symptoms appear. For these reasons, among the multiple factors that must be considered when starting or changing a DMT in pMS, comorbidities constitute a decisive element.

TITLE: Comorbilidades en la esclerosis múltiple y su influencia en la elección del tratamiento.Los estudios clínicos de tratamientos para personas con esclerosis múltiple (pEM) se realizan en poblaciones seleccionadas, que excluyen a pacientes que presenten comorbilidades o medicaciones concomitantes. Sin embargo, un gran porcentaje de las pEM tiene alguna enfermedad adicional, que podría afectar a la respuesta y la elección del tratamiento. El objetivo de esta revisión es valorar cómo pueden las diferentes patologías concurrentes impactar en la elección de las terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad (TME) en las pEM. Se seleccionaron artículos relevantes mediante búsqueda en PubMed. Las comorbilidades se agruparon, a los fines de mejor ordenamiento de los artículos encontrados, en patologías diversas: autoinmunes, infecciones crónicas, cardiovasculares, respiratorias, metabólicas, oncológicas, neuropsiquiátricas y epilepsia. En cuanto a las patologías autoinmunes, es clave tener en cuenta los efectos de las TME sobre ellas y la posibilidad de interacción con sus tratamientos específicos. Las terapias inmunomoduladoras son seguras para personas con infecciones crónicas. Los tratamientos inmunosupresores, en general, están contraindicados en personas con infecciones activas. En las comorbilidades cardiovasculares y metabólicas deben tenerse en cuenta las potenciales reacciones de infusión asociadas a anticuerpos monoclonales, y los fenómenos asociados al inicio de tratamiento con moduladores del receptor de la esfingosina-1-fosfato. Las TME con efecto inmunosupresor están contraindicadas en personas con malignidades activas. Aunque la patología psiquiátrica de por sí no impide el uso de TME, debería tenerse precaución cuando aparecen nuevos síntomas psiquiátricos, y siempre tenerse en cuenta su monitorización y tratamiento. Por este motivo, entre los múltiples factores que deben considerarse a la hora de iniciar o cambiar una TME en pEM, las comorbilidades constituyen un elemento muchas veces decisivo.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in MS refractory relapses: Long-term outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is considered a treatment option for steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Our objective was to assess long-term clinical response to TPE in MS steroid-refractory exacerbations. METHODS: Retrospective study of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients presenting intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMPS)-refractory relapses, who underwent TPE. Response to TPE was assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24-months post-treatment, and compared to a second group of RRMS patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics presenting, IVMPS-refractory relapses but not treated with TPE. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess potential predictors of significant clinical response. RESULTS: Between 2011 to 2020, a total of 23 RRMS patients were treated with TPE. Twenty-one patients not receiving the treatment served as controls. No differences in demographic or clinical characteristics, or predictors of clinical improvement after TPE were detected between groups. Seventy-eight percent of patients treated with TPE presented clinical improvement at 24 months. TPE-treated patients presented lower EDSS scores at 6 and at 24 months. Younger age, presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions and TPE treatment were associated with better clinical outcomes. No life-threatening side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: TPE is a safe and well tolerated procedure that decreases long-term disability in RRMS patients with IVMPS-refractory relapses.

[Argentinean consensus guidelines on the identification and clinical care of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis]. / Consenso sobre la identificación y seguimiento de la esclerosis múltiple secundaria progresiva en Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: The identification, diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) show significant differences between health care professionals in Argentina. AIM: To provide consensus recommendations on the management of patients with SPMS in Argentina to optimize patient care. DEVELOPMENT: A panel of expert neurologists from Argentina dedicated to the diagnosis and care of multiple sclerosis patients gathered during 2019 and 2020 to carry out a consensus recommendation on the diagnosis and treatment of SPMS patients in Argentina. To achieve consensus, the methodology of 'formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method' was used. Recommendations were established based on published evidence and the expert opinion. Recommendations focused on how to define SPMS and how to follow SPMS patients. CONCLUSION: The recommendations of this consensus guidelines attempt to optimize the care of SPMS patients in Argentina.

TITLE: Consenso sobre la identificación y seguimiento de la esclerosis múltiple secundaria progresiva en Argentina.Introducción. Existen diferencias significativas en el diagnóstico, la identificación y el seguimiento de pacientes con esclerosis múltiple secundaria progresiva (EMSP) entre los profesionales de la salud a cargo de su tratamiento. Objetivo. Proveer recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento de los pacientes con EMSP en Argentina con el fin de optimizar su cuidado. Desarrollo. Un grupo de neurólogos expertos en esclerosis múltiple de Argentina elaboró un consenso para el tratamiento de pacientes con EMSP en la región mediante metodología de ronda de encuestas a distancia y reuniones presenciales. Se establecieron 33 recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia publicada y en el criterio de los expertos que participaron. Las recomendaciones se enfocaron en el diagnóstico y el seguimiento de los pacientes con EMSP. Conclusión. Las recomendaciones establecidas en el presente consenso permitirían optimizar el cuidado y el seguimiento de los pacientes con EMSP en Argentina.

Disease activity impacts disability progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Although solid information on the natural history of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is available, evidence regarding impact of disease activity on PPMS progression remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, presence or absence of MRI activity, and natural history of a PPMS cohort from two referral centers in Argentina and assess whether clinical and/or radiological disease activity correlated with disability worsening. METHODS: Retrospective study conducted at two MS clinics in Buenos Aires, Argentina, through comparative analysis of patients with and without evidence of disease activity. RESULTS: Clinical and/or radiologic activity was presented in 56 (31%) of 178 patients. When stratified by age at onset, we found that for every 10 years of increase in age at onset, risk of reaching EDSS scores of 4 and 6 increased by 26% and 31%, respectively (EDSS 4: HR 1.26, CI 95%: 1.06-1.50; EDSS 6: HR 1.31, CI 95%: 1.06-1.62). Patients who presented clinical exacerbations reached EDSS scores of 6, 7 and 8 faster than those without associated exacerbations (p = 0.009, p = 0.016 and p = 0.001, respectively). Likewise, patients who presented gadolinium-enhancing lesions during the course of disease reached EDSS scores of 7 earlier (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Older age at onset and presence of clinical and/or radiological disease activity correlated with accelerated disability progression in this cohort of PPMS patients.

Gender ratio trends over time in multiple sclerosis patients from Argentina.

Several studies in multiple sclerosis (MS) suggest a trend of increasing disease frequency in women during the last decades. A direct comparison of gender ratio trends among MS populations from Argentina remains to be carried out. The objective of the study was to compare gender ratio trends, over a 50-year span in MS populations from Argentina. METHODS: multicenter study that included patients from 14 MS Centers of Argentina. Patients with definite MS with birth years ranging from 1940 to 1989 were included. Gender ratios were calculated by five decades based on year of birth and were adjusted for the F/M born-alive ratio derived from the Argentinean national registry of births. The F/M ratios were calculated using a multivariate logistic regression per five decades by the year of birth approach. Analyses were performed using Stata 10.1. RESULTS: 1069 patients were included. Gender ratios showed a significant increase from the first to the last decade in the whole MS sample (from 1.8 to 2.7; p value for trend=0.023). The Gender ratio did not show differences considering MS subtype. CONCLUSION: our study showed a modest increase of the F/M ratio (from 1.8 to 2.7) over time among patients affected by MS in Argentina.

Increasing prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

UNLABELLED: In 1996, the prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) for the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires using the capture-recapture method was estimated to be between 14 and 19.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The aim of this study was to update the prevalence to 2014 following the same methodology. METHODS: Gran Buenos Aires is the denomination that refers to the megalopolis comprised by the autonomous city of Buenos Aires and the surrounding conurbation of the province of Buenos Aires. The study was carried out taking December 2014 as the prevalence month. We used the capture-recapture method to estimate the prevalence of MS cross-matching registries from 6 MS Centers from the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires. Log-linear model Poisson regression was used to estimate the number of affected MS patients not detected by any of the 6 sources considered. RESULTS: 1035 registries were obtained from the 6 lists from 910 different patients detected. The population of the area based on 2010 census was 12,806,866, the number of MS cases estimated amongst source interactions were 4901. The estimated prevalence was 38.2 per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 36.1-41.2). CONCLUSION: The study is an update almost 20 years after the first one in the area showing a significant increase in the previous reported prevalence. Our findings are in line with previous studies performed in other regions of the world.

Disease onset in familial and sporadic multiple sclerosis in Argentina.

UNLABELLED: The present study was carried out to assess if there is an anticipation of age at onset in younger generations of familial multiple sclerosis (FMS) vs. sporadic MS (SMS) in Argentina. METHODS: multicenter study that included patients from 14 MS Centers of Argentina. Patients were considered as FMS if they had in their family at least one relative of first or second degree diagnosed with MS; otherwise, patients were considered to have SMS. We compared the age at onset between familial and sporadic cases as well as the age at onset between relatives from different generations in FMS vs. SMS. RESULTS: 1333 patients were included, 97 of them were FMS (7.3%). A lower age at onset in the younger generations of FMS cases was found compared with older generations of FMS as well as. SMS cases (24.1±3.7 years vs. 30.3±5.7 years, and 32.4±9.4 respectively; p<0.001). No differences were observed between older generations of FMS vs. SMS cases (p=0.12). CONCLUSION: we observed an anticipation of age at onset of MS in younger generations of patients with FMS vs. older generations of FMS and SMS.